It's so factually wrong RDNA5 generation has zero purpose-built dGFX parts.
AT0 is a cloud gaming part. Those rejects have all those gfx bits because they'll be used for cloud gaming.
None of them are.
As long as it's actually vailable to buy for financially irresponsible shut ins like myself I don't care what the business strategy was behind its design 🤪
It's an alright market.
That's what I meant about 7900 series.
.microsoft has big plans for cloud gaming
Oh no, that one was nightmarishly scary.
Oh no no one at AMD gafs about math rates.
Oh lol I always forget about MS, but then so does everyone else 😂🤣
I'll assume that one was sarcasm given it was on all the PR and retail box info.
They didn't quote doubled SPs or anything.
And I did not call him on that one.
Prediction bookmarked.
I am nVidia from Riva128, but 9070XT (or 9060 XT) is the part I recommend to people I know now, RDNA4 is excellent and it's clearly selling well.
Oh wow, what a shocker, and one can say Zen generation has "zero purpose-built parts" for client too, did not stop AMD from succeeding there.
Navi36 and Navi4c both died, big dawg. lmao.
It's aight but AMD is still at ~7% mss despite both RDNA4 parts launching.
See that's the thing.
No, those are separate design candidates.
N31XTX and XT.
Cutting AT0 down that much isn't likely to be needed. It's 512b full config, so 384 is already a heavily salvaged die.
Depends on how many SMs NV loads into GR203.
if heavily chopped AT0 is in the ballpark then they're gonna ship a full die and go hunting.
Isn't AT0 going to be a huge die like 700mm2 or so? if 264mm2 (basing on the MLID Xbox Magnus leak) for AT2 is with a 192-bit bus and assuming 72SMs then scaling the multiplier on a rough assumption of 512 / 192 = 2.666666666666667 and then 2.666666666666667 x 264 gets you to 704mm2 or so. Especially it's N3P. And they can switch apparently I/O dies so probably a cheap Pci-E Gen 5 N6 die for client and then Gen 6 for fancier stuff according to leaked RDNA 5 documents.
Pretty muich (though I think AT4 won't appear in dGPU, won't be surprised if AMD like just tries to push Medusa Halo kits and maybe down the line Grimlock Halo's successor is on AM6 w/ 2100 pins as the future of entry level stuff for Desktop in a mini ITX format) I think AT1 is financially hard to justify because if AMD needs say a 24GB that's faster than the current AT2... they'll probably do potentially an N3X (Since current RDNA 5 GMDs are N3P) + 4GB GDDR7 Module RDNA 5 refresh in 2028 that launches along the same time frame as Zen 7 since IIRC Lisa Su noted that Zen sales are boosted when new graphics come out? Can see Zen 7 + N3X RDNA5 refresh synergy in 2028.
Let's be real, bare minimum. It'll be 96 absolute maximum (my crystal ball tells me so) and only the 6080 and 6090 laptop is seeing close to that SM count. 6070 Ti will be the dregs.
I can see them being opportunistic if they get close, yeah. It's the only scenario we see anything other than heavily chopped AT0 in the client space.
It probably will, but purely to get rid of the dies with poor V/f curves that can't be shipped in any MDSP SKU.
No lol.
yea gonna bet on 96SM config too.
Cancelling is one thing; having no replacement at all is outright boorish.
It's very frustrating. And RDNA 5 seems to only amplify this.
It's ok.
Well RDNA3 would've been kind of underwhelming relative to full die ad102 in any case.
nanitemaxxed computecels care not about grungy old RBEs.
IDK, +30% clock would have put it right in 4090 space. Nb for a substantially smaller die and a hell of a lot less N5 than AD102.
Nanite. SHUDDER
sorry pal, 'fun' is an evil word and is banned at AMD.
Clocks are not universal across workloads doe.
