• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 1007 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It s indicative that, at best for them, some reviewers at NBC are amateurish,
beside this score is used in their perfs average score of a CPU.
 
I wonder if these 9950X3D2 benchmark results are from engineering samples so we’re going to see further improvements later.
 
Last edited:
ngocnghith2 said:
The IPC gains on Granite Ridge are what I’m watching. If the rumors about the wider execution engine are true, we might finally see a massive jump in single-core performance. I’m holding off on a platform upgrade until the official benchmarks drop.
Click to expand...
Dude what? Granite Ridge came out in 2024 . . .
 
One posted in a year's old thread the other day about anticipating the performance of a gen 9 mobile processor from Intel. They're getting sneaky.
 
I may have missed it in all the excitement.
The so-called "Gorgon Point" includes two dies? I.e. one name replaces both Kraken and Strix Point?
 
gdansk said:
I.e. one name replaces both Kraken and Strix Point?
Click to expand...
Yes.

AI 7 445 is the single SKU "branding" of the year candidate.
It is 2+4, lower clocked, 8MB L3 vs AI 5 340(3+3, 16MB L3), yet promoted to "AI 7". Not that others don't have naming issues but this is amusing.
 
regen1 said:
Yes.

AI 7 445 is the single SKU "branding" of the year candidate.
It is 2+4, lower clocked, 8MB L3 vs AI 5 340(3+3, 16MB L3), yet promoted to "AI 7". Not that others don't have naming issues but this is amusing.
Click to expand...
Sneaky. I hadn't paid much attention to the 400 series since it seemed like a straightforward +100MHz rename. But making some of the new SKUs worse than the preceding SKU is malicious.
 
Tigerick said:
www.asus.com

ASUS Deutschland

Entdecke die Welt von ASUS - Alles rund um die besten Mainboards, Grafikkarten, Monitore, Laptops und vieles mehr erfährst Du auf der offiziellen ASUS Seite.
www.asus.com www.asus.com

ASUS China has started selling variant of A14 for around ~USD$1437 with AMD 392 (12-core Zen5 + RDNA3.5 40CU), 32GB 256-bit LPDDR5x + 1TB SSD. How do you think of pricing? 🙄
Click to expand...
Same price as this one :


Or this one :


Do the maths.
 
Apparently AMD is preparing Gorgon Halo, the Strix Halo refresh with a couple more MHz on CPU and GPU clocks.




AMD also decided to produce some slides where they compare Panther Lake to the Gorgon/Strix range. They're clearly positioning 256bit Halo against 128bit Panther Lake in these, so I'm expecting the price they demanded for Halo to go down drastically. However, for 15-20W handhelds I still expect Panther Lake's G3 series to come out on top of Halo, not to mention support for the latest ML-based upscalers and similar RT performance.


1769159360759.png
1769159462660.png
 
Fjodor2001 said:
9850X3D has same perf as 9800X3D according to this:

wccftech.com

Early Leaks Reveal AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D Delivers Overall Same Performance As 9800X3D

Some users have already started posting benchmarks of AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D before the launch. The performance is similar to the 9800X3D.
wccftech.com wccftech.com

Need 9950X3D2 perhaps to get better performance.
Click to expand...

Clearly BS. There are number of opportunities for boost clock to go up 400 MHz, when the CPU is not thermally limited.

Upcoming reviews will show (modest) performance gains across the board, with some exceptions.
 
Joe NYC said:
Clearly BS. There are number of opportunities for boost clock to go up 400 MHz, when the CPU is not thermally limited.

Upcoming reviews will show (modest) performance gains across the board, with some exceptions.
Click to expand...
Yeah, perhaps some tiny gains. But 9950X3D2 will perform better, so that’s what to get if you care about bragging rights.
 
Fjodor2001 said:
Yeah, perhaps some tiny gains. But 9950X3D2 will perform better, so that’s what to get if you care about bragging rights.
Click to expand...

Yeah, bragging rights. But 9850x3d is the one that will bring the big $$$s.

Interestingly, AMD is charging very modest $20 premium at $499. Which is what I would have done as well. $500 is a magic number for CPU that you don't exceed if you want to call it a mainstream CPU.

Which will be a bit of a problem for Zen 6, to keep it under $500. Maybe sub-12-core models.
 
Joe NYC said:
Yeah, bragging rights. But 9850x3d is the one that will bring the big $$$s.

Interestingly, AMD is charging very modest $20 premium at $499. Which is what I would have done as well. $500 is a magic number for CPU that you don't exceed if you want to call it a mainstream CPU.

Which will be a bit of a problem for Zen 6, to keep it under $500. Maybe sub-12-core models.
Click to expand...
It’s just a mid/late-life kicker to grab attention. Will not bring any substantial perf improvements. For those buying a completely new system anyway it may be worth buying.

But otherwise it’s just bragging rights. And if that’s what you’re aiming for, better to wait for 9950X3D2.
 
Fjodor2001 said:
It’s just a mid/late-life kicker to grab attention. Will not bring any substantial perf improvements. For those buying a completely new system anyway it may be worth buying.

But otherwise it’s just bragging rights. And if that’s what you’re aiming for, better to wait for 9950X3D2.
Click to expand...

If they have the bins, and can get extra money for them, then it is just a good business decision. In addition to a good PR move.

There will be a new wave of publicity when these parts get tested in a week or so.
 
ToTTenTranz said:
That's 25W, not 15-20W. At 15W, Strix Halo is barely faster than Strix Point:

View attachment 137267

Plus, Timespy is a synthetic GPU test that won't take much power from the CPU, which benefits the GPU in power constrained scenarios.


That's why Panther Lake should be significantly faster than Strix Halo at lower power budgets.
Click to expand...
strix halo is not meant for 15watts

it scales linearly between 25 watts & 55 watts

medusa halo might operate at a wider power range. possibly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top