Haven't they already made enough announcements regarding HBMDo you think companies like AMD will make any announcements regarding HBM
Customized for LPDDR functionalityHaven't they already made enough announcements regarding HBM
Yes it's a base die.Customized for LPDDR functionality
Did co-development play such a pivotal role in sam's transition to 4nm?Any questions?
Anything actually planned for SF2P/X?Yes it's a base die.
Yes it's on SF4X.
Yes it has LPDDR shoreline.
Yes AMD has tapped SF2P/X PDKs.
Any questions?
No.Did co-development play such a pivotal role in sam성's transition to 4nm?
Memory is a commodity, thus their opinions are irrelevant.Those in the memory guy usually dismiss its impact, treating it like a trivial late-stage addition.
Dunno.Anything actually planned for SF2P/X?
Does it matter? They say and DRAM slaves obey.What is the estimated share of AMD's contribution to this joint development? 10%?
yeah~ I'm just curious if AMD's IPs, such as Infinity Fabric (IF), were integrated into it.Does it matter? They say and DRAM slaves obey.
Obviously, that's the whole point of a custom base die.I'm just curious if AMD's IPs, such as Infinity Fabric (IF), were integrated into it.
Left to themselves, they’ll probably reach a point where they deny it's even 'Custom'. thanks, sirObviously, that's the whole point of a custom base die.
Customer IP goes there!
What's the advantage of that vs a standard stack. Where does the benefit come from?Obviously, that's the whole point of a custom base die.
Customer IP goes there!
You get to pick your base die process node, and again, you put your IP there.What's the advantage of that vs a standard stack. Where does the benefit come from?
They've been tickling SF PDKs for years. It's why we keep getting rumours of Samsung-made APUs etc.But they tickle the PDK.
Same! 🤣lol I could be in a random meeting and anytime someone says anything that sounds close to SMT I always think of this forum and SMT4...
Then I get weird looks because i'm smiling to myself.
Huh, so GFX125x has only 128 ALUs per WGP?
No, it's 256 ALUs for most vector ops.Huh, so GFX125x has only 128 ALUs per WGP?
Interesting.
I guess GFX130x/131x WGPs will still have 256 ALUs though, otherwise the RDNA5 VOPD improvements would be kind of pointless, unless I'm missing something.
It's also interesting that the SEs are no longer equivalent to the "agents", like they were in previous gens.
Looks like AMD introduced another control layer above SEs. I wonder if that's more about utilization, or about flexibility.
My first thought was it might've been about chiplets, but GFX94x already had chiplets too, so I guess not.
He checked and says there's no LPDDR. What should I do about this?
Tell him to check again after he actually wakes up?