• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Intel Core i9-9900K Ashes Of The Singularity Benchmarks

Which Intel 9th Generation CPUs are you most interested in?

  • Core i9-9900K (8 Core / 16 Thread)

    Votes: 8 88.9%
  • Core i7-9700K (8 Core / 8 Thread)

    Votes: 1 11.1%

  • Total voters
    9
Status
Not open for further replies.

HaxSeeker

Junior Member
Ashes of Singularity benchmark remains a popular prototype benchmarking tool for testers. The latest CPUs and GPUs are tested there before they are even made public. Lucky for Us, we can have information prior to the launch of particular CPU and GPU. The initial benchmarks test depends on several variables and samples so you take this information with a grain of a salt.

Intel-Core-i9-9900k-vs-8700k-Benchmark.jpg


Source: WccfTech

This included a link to the OP's personal tech
website where they plagiarized the WCCF article
in its entirety. This link was removed.

Additionally, they failed to disclose
it was their website, and we do not allow self-promotion
here.

AT Mod Usandthem
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Huh. Interesting. The 9900k scores better in heavy batch vs normal batch, vice versa for the 8700k.

In the end kind of a wash.

Also, RX Vega? Why?
 
Is this mostly the extra cache doing the heavy lifting? I thought Ashes didn't really scale above 6 cores anyway?
 
If it were locked at 3.6 the CPU framerates would be lower than the ones of the 8700K....
So that's even more suspicious that the leaker does not know.

Perhaps both were locked at 3.6/3.7 to compare clock for clock with two more cores and more cache?
 
So that's even more suspicious that the leaker does not know.
Perhaps both were locked at 3.6/3.7 to compare clock for clock with two more cores and more cache?

Dunno if he s not more knowledgeable than what he state, comparisons with what s available with the 8700k in the AoS database could give a hint...

Hmm, okay. Still seems weird to use a Vega but hey, why not?

For the CPU framerate it doesnt matter, also not using a faster GPU is a mean to not give infos on the behaviour in CPU limited graphic tests, if they used a 1080ti the actual perf would be transparent, or at least better cornered...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top