• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

PrimeGrid Races 2017

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Must I be the first one to point out that our team rank is prime? :cocktail:

As promised, xii5ku is being consigned to community service at WCG now. I sentenced him to 10 days crunching OpenZika on all of the nodes which he used during the PG race.
 
As always, thanks Ken for organizing and updating us.

Surprisingly, the old X6 did ok crunching PG. Just uses a lot of power. 😛
 
Ken g6 said:
Here's the (tentative) list of all races for this year:

[ IMG ]
Click to expand...

I get a 404 instead of the image. Here is the list in ASCII.
Code: 
    Date             Time UTC   Project(s)   Challenge                               Duration
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1   3-13 January     18:00:00   GCW-Sieve    Isaac Newton's Birthday Challenge       10 days
2   10-25 March *)   12:00:00   SoB-LLR      Year of the Fire Rooster Challenge      15 days
3   7-22 April       12:00:00   PSP-LLR      Mathematics Awareness Month Challenge   15 days
4   12-13 June       00:00:00   SGS-LLR      PrimeGrid's Birthday Challenge           1 day
5   20-23 August     18:00:00   GCW-LLR      Solar Eclipse Challenge                  3 days
6   3-8 September    18:00:00   321-LLR      Number Theory Week Challenge             5 days
7   18-23 October    00:00:00   TRP-LLR      Diwali/Deepavali Challenge               5 days
8   17-20 November   12:00:00   GFN-15       Pierre de Fermat's Birthday Challenge    3 days
                                GFN-16
                                GFN-17-Low
9   18-21 December   16:28:00   PPS-Sieve    Winter Solstice Challenge                3 days

Edit, March 6:
*) Races # 2 and 3 postponed, as noted by Ken g6 below
Edit, April 2:
Race # 3 is a go, as originally scheduled.
 
Last edited:
Well, that is really the only time I run PrimeGrid 🙁
I guess I'll focus more on the FB 3day sprints. It breaks up the monotony of just running a project here and there. Gives a little excitement. Guess I need a life😵😱
 
Time to bump this thread for the next race, in less than a week.
 
Interesting: LLR can apparently be run in multithreaded mode.
It's a trade-off between multi-threading overhead and multi-processing overhead.

Edit: I posted 2P Broadwell-EP results in the PrimeGrid CPU thread.
 
Last edited:
Engaged two humble 4-core Haswells with PSP-LLR now.

Against logic, I decided to leave the Broadwell-EPs at Einstein for a little more.
 
This one was an early start for me, but I got a few cores going too.
 
Unfortunately I don't think I'll be able to contribute any cores for this race, since its all on Einstein right now
 
Kiska said:
Unfortunately I don't think I'll be able to contribute any cores for this race, since its all on Einstein right now
Click to expand...
This is a 15-day race. The current FormulaBOINC race will end before this one does. (So will the next FormulaBOINC race.)
 
OK, 4x14 cores went from Einstein to Sierpiński.

Edit:
Also, a 10-core CPU which is currently carrying 6 GPU feeder tasks for Einstein, is now running PSP-LLR on the remaining 4 cores like so:
Code: 
<app_config>
   <app>
      <name>llrPSP</name>
      <max_concurrent>2</max_concurrent>
      <fraction_done_exact/>
   </app>
   <app_version>
      <app_name>llrPSP</app_name>
      <cmdline>-t 2</cmdline>
      <avg_ncpus>2</avg_ncpus>
      <max_ncpus>2</max_ncpus>
   </app_version>
</app_config>
 
Last edited:
Day 1.2 stats:

Rank___Credits____Username
11_____169145_____xii5ku

Rank__Credits____Team
5_____570957_____BOINC@Poland
6_____398897_____Czech National Team
7_____204596_____The Knights Who Say Ni!
8_____169145_____TeAm AnandTech
9_____157951_____US Navy
10____67306______Special: Off-Topic
11____65936______PrimeSearchTeam
Orange Kid said:
One day down and only two to go till I finish some WU's. These things are as slow as molasses.😱😵🙂
Click to expand...

And that's why it's a 15-day race. 😱 That's also one reason why @StefanR5R's multithreading post is useful. Multithreading may be easier than juggling.
 
Multithreading is also the major (if not only) reason why there are more than 0 credits in the day 1.2 stats. :sunglasses:

By the way, these WUs are not only looong, their runtimes are also untypically variable for PrimeGrid's standards. They seem to be bimodally distributed. This confused me already during the past week when I tested PSP-LLR multicore scaling.
 
Day 2.125 stats:

Rank___Credits____Username
7______697292_____xii5ku
142____22926______Ken_g6

Rank__Credits____Team
4_____1969519____Czech National Team
5_____1589216____BOINC@Poland
6_____1187362____BOINC@MIXI
7_____720219_____TeAm AnandTech
8_____641068_____US Navy
9_____636052_____The Knights Who Say Ni!
10____623846_____Team 2ch

Everybody but Stefan and me using slow computers and not multithreading?

By the way, I turned on multithreading on my laptop yesterday, and it only ran one existing WU at a time. I had to change the config file to turn it back off temporarily.
 
Orange Kid said:
Yes.
Can I switch to multicore in the middle of a WU?
Is this for real cores or can virtual cores be included? IE: my I5 as two cores or four?
Click to expand...
Switching in the middle of a WU seems to finish it on only one core. 🙁 HT doesn't help either.
 
Ken g6 said:
By the way, I turned on multithreading on my laptop yesterday, and it only ran one existing WU at a time. I had to change the config file to turn it back off temporarily.
Click to expand...

I am not sure anymore, but perhaps the same (under-utitilized host) happened to me during my experiments with this feature on the Xeons before the challenge.

Right now all is fine:
4 single-thread tasks on a 4C CPU,
2 dual-thread tasks on another 4C,
2 dual-thread tasks plus 6 e@h feeders on 10C (PrimeGrid forced to 2 tasks max as posted above, by means of the max_concurrent tag),
1 four-thread task plus 3 e@h feeders on 6C/HT (PrimeGrid forced to 1 task max),
14 dual-thread tasks on 2x14C,
4 seven-thread tasks on 2x14C.​
I will revisit how the two 2x14s do in terms of PPD after one or two more days and reconfigure as indicated. (One 4C and the 6C will have to leave PrimeGrid during the week due to their noise.)

Note, omit max_concurrent in the app_config.xml if you do not want to specify a CPU limit in this way. (I guess Ken g6 is aware of that, just mentioning it for others who, like myself, do not deal with app_config.xml's day in, day out...)

Orange Kid said:
Can I switch to multicore in the middle of a WU?
Click to expand...

I switched once in the following way:
  • Had four single-threaded tasks running on a 4C,
  • wrote C:\ProgramData\BOINC\projects\www.primegrid.com\app_config.xml,
  • exited boincmgr and had it shut down the tasks at this point,
  • restarted boincmgr.
This resulted in two of the four tasks continuing from their previous progress percentage, but now running dual-threaded instead of single threaded. And the other two tasks sat there waiting for their turn, and they were also continued dual-threaded without losing previous progress. To be sure, I later looked these tasks up at the PrimeGrid web site, and they were marked valid (3) or pending (1), not invalid or error.

Orange Kid said:
Is this for real cores or can virtual cores be included?
Click to expand...

I tested hyperthreading only with single-threaded tasks, and it was detrimental even on Linux (which I assume to deal better with hyperthreading than Windows). My guess is that it is detrimental with multi-threaded PSP-LLR tasks too. (edit) Unfortunately, to prove or disprove it by measurement takes a long time. But from what I read elsewhere, HT is generally discouraged with LLR.

Orange Kid said:
IE: my I5 as two cores or four?
Click to expand...

(edit) That would be two cores on i5-6200U, 2 single-threaded workers or 1 dual-threaded worker with HT off, or with HT on with total utilization forced to 50 %. Or double as many with HT on at 100 %, but possibly performing worse overall.

I switched hyperthreading off in the BIOS of all my machines, except in the two Einstein@Home feeders. (Which will soon leave E@H for other endeavors.)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top