snoopy7548
Diamond Member
AI sucks, but I've seen senior design engineers make similar mistakes (connector is backwards, missing a net connection, etc.). But not all at once like AI does.
Was wondering when I'd start seeing this shit, as an EE I'm gonna say this guy can take his AI circuit board and shove it up his ass. How much time did he piss away trying to do something with AI that could be done in like a couple hours or less by a person. If I fucked up a board this simple so badly on my first spin my ass would be fired but for some reason people keep plugging away at it with AI.
I don't know what the purpose of the project was. All I know is what I presented here. It's kind of an amusing exercise that doesn't cost much money. 'See what the computer can do by itself'. However, he talks about V1, so it sounds like he's gonna persist with it. After getting it so horribly wrong on such a simple device, I don't know why you'd try again any time soon. If the next one is correct, is it because the process improved, or did you just get lucky?Was wondering when I'd start seeing this shit, as an EE I'm gonna say this guy can take his AI circuit board and shove it up his ass. How much time did he piss away trying to do something with AI that could be done in like a couple hours or less by a person. If I fucked up a board this simple so badly on my first spin my ass would be fired but for some reason people keep plugging away at it with AI.
This is why I'm dubious about the intent, or process. 'ill fated question that results in random/dubious output' was definitely a feature of earlier LLMs but today? AI should be able to smoke such a simple target. I'm guessing something was janky with his process, or he intentionally screwed it up.I don't know what the purpose of the project was. All I know is what I presented here. It's kind of an amusing exercise that doesn't cost much money. 'See what the computer can do by itself'. However, he talks about V1, so it sounds like he's gonna persist with it. After getting it so horribly wrong on such a simple device, I don't know why you'd try again any time soon. If the next one is correct, is it because the process improved, or did you just get lucky?
That's the biggest problem with ai imo. It's a random results generator. Regardless of how well you structure it, it comes down to chance whether or not it's right. I don't know how you work with that.
OpenAI: “we are merely a knowledge base.”
![]()
ChatGPT allegedly advised Florida State shooter when and where to strike
SAN FRANCISCO - Florida’s attorney general announced a criminal investigation of ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, alleging the company’s chatbot advised the man accused of killing two people in a shooting at Flo...www.yahoo.com
I don't really follow this stuff. How does RISC-V compare to x86 in general? How well would a human designed chip perform?
I switched on the LO ribbon for my wife in a Windows VM on my machine. She liked it, I really don't 🙂Agentic AI is now the default mode for Office apps. I detest LibreOffice, don’t make me switch.
Agentic AI is now the default mode for Office apps. I detest LibreOffice, don’t make me switch.