Question WASM benchmarks to test your CPU using Firefox (Justin's and pspdfkit)

[igor_kavinski]

Webbench - WASM CPU Benchmark

mayfield.github.io

WebAssembly Benchmark by Nutrient

Justin's benchmark the higher the better while the pdf one the lower the better.

Make sure to select the correct number of threads in Justin's benchmark. It may not detect them properly.

Core i7-4770 scores with Firefox V124





Xeon Gold 6248R scores





Xeon 6248R with Chrome V123 (shows why Firefox is preferable for WASM benchmarks)

 

[igor_kavinski]

These two for academic interest:

JavaScript vs WebAssembly easy benchmark

https://00f.net/2023/01/04/webassembly-benchmark-2023/

 

[SamMaster]

I got 1048 with my R5 5600X

 

[Markfw]

on the first one 108.99 7950x

1075 for the second.

 

[igor_kavinski]

on the first one 108.99 7950x

1075 for the second.

Something's not right. I think you tried in Chrome? No way a 5600X would beat a 7950X.

Firefox's implementation of WebAssembly is the best so it will give the highest score.

 

[Markfw]

Something's not right. I think you tried in Chrome? No way a 5600X would beat a 7950X.

Firefox's implementation of WebAssembly is the best so it will give the highest score.

I don't have firefox installed. I used chrome.

 

[gdansk]

Still seems lower than expected for a 7950X. I score 1007 in PSPDFKit benchmark in Chrome v123 on a 1250U and 1085 on Snapdragon 8g3.

 

[igor_kavinski]

Chrome sucks. Look at how bad the Xeon does in Chrome. Goes down from 169 to just 69.

 

[Markfw]

Completed in: 25.0s, Megarads: 221.94/s, firefox bench 1

All done!
PSPDFKit Wasm Score
708

bench 2. 7950x

 

[igor_kavinski]

Great. 48 Cascade Lake Xeon threads put to shame by 32 Zen 4 threads.

PDF score is great too!

 

[gdansk]

On my 7950X now. Firefox v123. No undervolt, PBO or anything. Fan didn't even ramp up for either test (not sure how good of a CPU benchmark they make then).

Test 1 - 255.45

Spoiler

Test 2 - 609

Spoiler

 

[Markfw]

Great. 48 Cascade Lake Xeon threads put to shame by 32 Zen 4 threads.

PDF score is great too!

Intel has not had a good CPU, Xeon or otherwise since 2016.

 

[gdansk]

Intel has not had a good CPU, Xeon or otherwise since 2016.

I think 14900K(S) will be leading in this short benchmark as soon as one of the owners shows up.

 

[igor_kavinski]

I think 14900K(S) will be leading in this short benchmark as soon as one of the owners shows up.

Do we even have one on the forums here?

 

[igor_kavinski]

Fan didn't even ramp up for either test (not sure how good of a CPU benchmark they make then).

Odd. I saw all 48 threads on the Xeon go to 100%, though for a short time so maybe that's why. Also, it's probably not FPU intensive so not heating up the execution units that much.

 

[exitorious]

I think 14900K(S) will be leading in this short benchmark as soon as one of the owners shows up.

14900kf scores, latest version of Firefox:

 

[igor_kavinski]

14900kf scores, latest version of Firefox:

Can you post your CPU-Z memory tab screenshot?

Also, is this stock or are you running with increased all core clocks with AIO cooler?

 

[exitorious]

Can you post your CPU-Z memory tab screenshot?

Also, is this stock or are you running with increased all core clocks with AIO cooler?

A small 58x all core overclock and ddr 7800

 

[igor_kavinski]

Core i7-1065G7

287.1 seconds, 19.35/s Megarads

PSPDFKit 1719

With HT off, 362.8 seconds, 15.31/s Megarads

PSPDFKit 1788

 

[igor_kavinski]

A small 58x all core overclock and ddr 7800

If you don't mind, can you do only P-cores with HT on and off? Only the Justin bench.

 

[Markfw]

A small 58x all core overclock and ddr 7800

small ??? give me a break.... And your cooling ?

 

[exitorious]

small ??? give me a break.... And your cooling ?

It isn't really an amazing overclock. Every 14900k I've tried (3 total) can do that just by running the Intel tuning utility. As for the cooling it is an ek nucleus 360 aio.

 

[Markfw]

It isn't really an amazing overclock. Every 14900k I've tried (3 total) can do that just by running the Intel tuning utility. As for the cooling it is an ek nucleus 360 aio.

And if I had not commented. And someone NOT in the know was to read, he would think that he could buy that CPU and run it 24/7 at 100% and get the same results, faster than a stock 7950x. THIS is why I have a problem with this, misrepresentation.

 

[exitorious]

And if I had not commented. And someone NOT in the know was to read, he would think that he could buy that CPU and run it 24/7 at 100% and get the same results, faster than a stock 7950x. THIS is why I have a problem with this, misrepresentation.

I suppose it would be their fault for not asking and I do usually run it 24/7 upscaling videos with topaz ai. I don't care about power usage, just speed. That is why I sold my 7950x. When the next AMD processor comes out I will buy that since I assume it will be faster. When Intel puts out whatever they put out I'll buy that if it is faster. I don't care who makes it as long as it is the best.

 

[igor_kavinski]

Fair enough