Question Zen 6 Speculation Thread

[Hulk]

I'm memeing.
Trying to read into performance from 1.4-2.0 GHz region is indeed pointless.

Indeed. Looking at the ST score if the frequency is 2.0 then performance is flat over Lion Cove. If frequency is 1.4 then we're looking at 45% better than Lion Cove. Obviously reality is somewhere in the middle, which we could have guessed 10 years ago so the information is meaningless.

 

[Jan Olšan]

Anybody has a score for Ryzen 9 9950X locked to 1.4 GHz?

 

[511]

Anybody has a score for Ryzen 9 9950X locked to 1.4 GHz?

you can calculate that off of a valid score divide by frequency where there is no noise in the datta

 

[Geddagod]

Anybody has a score for Ryzen 9 9950X locked to 1.4 GHz?

the issue isn't getting the Zen 5 data. I'm sure someone can do that, or just use a stock config and accept PPC is going to be marginally higher at 1.4GHz than it is at 5.7GHz.
It's the varying reported frequencies in the Zen 6 sku that is the issue. The sample also hit 2GHz for example, and then also reported 1.5GHz.

 

[511]

the issue isn't getting the Zen 5 data. I'm sure someone can do that, or just use a stock config and accept PPC is going to be marginally higher at 1.4GHz than it is at 5.7GHz.
It's the varying reported frequencies in the Zen 6 sku that is the issue. The sample also hit 2GHz for example, and then also reported 1.5GHz.

It's possible for a CPU to hit all the CPU Frequency in the data but the issue is what's the correct one

 

[adroc_thurston]

the issue isn't getting the Zen 5 data. I'm sure someone can do that, or just use a stock config and accept PPC is going to be marginally higher at 1.4GHz than it is at 5.7GHz.
It's the varying reported frequencies in the Zen 6 sku that is the issue. The sample also hit 2GHz for example, and then also reported 1.5GHz.

you're not gonna calculate perf per clock is the fabric is locked to 400MHz