• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Resident Evil 7 Demo Benchmarks

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Headfoot said:
Yeah, his benchmark run of Resident Evil 7 Demo definitely doesn't belong in this thread about Resident Evil 7 Demo benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Looks like thread title was edited.
Headfoot, why play games? You know why I made that comment. Romper Room in here, always.
 
Keysplayr said:
Im pretty sure it was edited. Previous title was the specific reason for my post. Note to self and advice to others. Screenshot Bacon1's thread titles right when he makes them.
Click to expand...

Feel free. The title was not edited. It would say "Edited" on the bottom of the initial post with a timestamp showing when it was edited if it had been. Stop threadcrapping and calling me a liar.
 
2017: forumites argue seriously benchmark run of Resident Evil 7 Demo does not belong in a post titled "Resident Evil 7 Demo benchmarks." You're right, I do know exactly why you posted, its just not a reason we're allowed to say.


You seriously posted this after my warning above this post?


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director


On a more relevant note:
psolord said:


Click to expand...

Can anyone tell a difference in the images - I for the life of me can't find even a single difference between High and Very high here, certainly not one that would merit the FPS difference
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Headfoot said:
2017: forumites argue seriously benchmark run of Resident Evil 7 Demo does not belong in a post titled "Resident Evil 7 Demo benchmarks." You're right, I do know exactly why you posted, its just not a reason we're allowed to say.

On a more relevant note:


Can anyone tell a difference in the images - I for the life of me can't find even a single difference between High and Very high here, certainly not one that would merit the FPS difference
Click to expand...
Not being from the exact angle makes it tough, but there is less than 10% performance difference, so I wouldn't expect a lot of difference in IQ either.
 
Headfoot said:
Can anyone tell a difference in the images - I for the life of me can't find even a single difference between High and Very high here, certainly not one that would merit the FPS difference
Click to expand...

Kind of hard to tell since they are lower quality jpgs and different angles, but I think the fridge and rolling metal cart thing are darker in the VH. But yes most games have very little difference between the "max" and "2nd from max" setting IQ wise compared to the perf hit for using "max".

_id1482151783_974050_1.png


http://www.game-debate.com/news/21988/resident-evil-7-pc-benchmark-msi-radeon-r9-380-gaming-2gb

_id1482143191_343178.png


http://www.game-debate.com/news/21986/resident-evil-7-pc-benchmark-msi-geforce-gtx-1060-gaming-x-6gb

_id1482143191_343178_3.png


http://www.game-debate.com/news/219...breakdown-and-most-important-graphics-options

Haven't seen that site before but looks like they did quite a bit of testing.
 
happy medium said:
For real, I may sell this card while its worth something. Mabe buy a used gtx980 for $200 and overclock it. Then I'll wait for the Pascal refresh in 8 months or so and buy a faster card at the end of the year..cheaper.
Click to expand...
There are already games that the 1070 does not in fact max out at 1080p. The 980 certainly doesn't that's for sure.

You can sell your card for max 300 why would someone buy a used product for more? So all in all you save $100 and ofcourse you won't be getting back whatever you pay for the 980 in full. So uhm doesn't sound like a hassle that's worth it at all and sacrificing current performance in the meanwhile.
 
Thinker_145 said:
There are already games that the 1070 does not in fact max out at 1080p. The 980 certainly doesn't that's for sure.

You can sell your card for max 300 why would someone buy a used product for more? So all in all you save $100 and ofcourse you won't be getting back whatever you pay for the 980 in full. So uhm doesn't sound like a hassle that's worth it at all and sacrificing current performance in the meanwhile.
Click to expand...

thanks I'll think about it more. I like to overclock my cards and this card is boring, slide settings to high done, rinse and repeat. It does hit 2140 core, but I don't need it so I keep it stock.

Its only 12% slower than a gtx1080 @ stock. Mabe as fast when overclocked.
perfrel_1920_1080.png
 
Last edited:
happy medium said:
thanks I'll think about it more. I like to overclock my cards and this card is boring, slide settings to high done, rinse and repeat. It does hit 2140 core, but I don't need it so I keep it stock.

Its only 12% slower than a gtx1080 @ stock. Mabe as fast when overclocked.
perfrel_1920_1080.png
Click to expand...
I don't find that boring it's an amazing feeling to just bump up everything to max and get on with it. I still have to make decisions regarding AA and DSR.

Yes the 1070 is the card of this generation and will end up as one of the better Nvidia cards in terms of long term value as it's immediate future still looks really good. Just enjoy the fact that you bought a GPU at quite a perfect time which doesn't happen often and stop over thinking things. 🙂

And no an overclocked 1070 will never quite be a stock 1080 but gets close enough sure.
 
happy medium said:
For real, I may sell this card while its worth something. Mabe buy a used gtx980 for $200 and overclock it. I only need 50/60fps high settings @1080p. Then I'll wait for the Pascal refresh in 8 months or so and buy a faster card at the end of the year..cheaper.
Click to expand...

Better undervolt and underclock it, its almost the same as OC in reverse 😉
 
More benchmarks coming out since game is releasing. Official NV drivers out.

470 4gb vs 1060 3gb: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Vq6G1e-tZw

PCGH has some of the GPUs tested as well and said they will be updaitng their article as they get more tests completed: http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Resid.../Specials/Benchmark-PC-Anforderungen-1219005/

Guru3D has some results up but said they had some strange problems recording fps: http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/resident_evil_7_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,7.html

Considering they have a 390x beating out 1080 at 1440p+ not finding that hard to believe. So I'd hold off on their results as it seems their testing methodology isn't working right.
 
happy medium said:
nothing, just wait for proper drivers with benchmarks.
Click to expand...

Those are with the official Nvidia game ready drivers. All 3 tests I posted use the latest 378.49 drivers

I'm guessing that guru3d has some setting set wrong or whatever they are using to capture fps is doing something wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top